Education access · In progress

Rural Physics Initiative

An early-stage effort to design low-cost experiment kits and supporting materials for schools with limited laboratory access.

01 / Personal context

Why access became a design question.

I was born in a rural area near Nanping and now study in Xiamen. During visits home, I noticed that students often encountered physics experiments mainly as textbook procedures rather than hands-on experiences.

The long-term goal is to design low-cost experiment kits and supporting digital materials that can work within real school constraints.

02 / Current status

A research foundation, with early local conversations.

The completed work forms a research foundation for a possible pilot. School implementation, a finished kit, and student-outcome evidence remain future milestones.

I also conducted preliminary conversations with three to four friends from Nanping about their experiences with physics learning and school experiments. These conversations provide exploratory local context rather than representative evidence for Nanping schools as a whole.

Completed

  • Desktop research record
  • Eight-source evidence matrix
  • Source-verification report
  • Research log
  • Draft interview, questionnaire, and observation instruments
  • Preliminary conversations with three to four friends from Nanping

Next evidence required

  • Confirmed school partnership
  • Teacher co-design
  • Validated bill of materials
  • Safety review
  • Completed kit prototype
  • Field pilot
  • Student outcome evidence

03 / Kit design principles

Design the conditions before designing the kit.

No bill of materials, safety review, completed prototype, or pilot evidence has yet been verified. These principles define the work that must come first.

01

Start with local evidence

Validate needs through consented, anonymized interviews, surveys, and observation before finalizing a kit.

02

Co-design with teachers

Treat teacher usability, curriculum fit, supervision, and maintenance as core design requirements.

03

Keep the setup realistic

Favor accessible materials, clear instructions, offline support, and repeatable measurements.

04

Claim only what is tested

Separate the planned intervention from completed work, and define success before a pilot begins.

04 / From research to pilot

A staged path that earns each next claim.

The sequence keeps consent, anonymity, teacher ownership, and feasibility ahead of scale.

Proposed validation path — concept only
  1. 01Research
  2. 02Local validation
  3. 03Teacher co-design
  4. 04Small pilot
  5. 05Revise

05 / Next responsible milestone

Validate one local need before a small pilot.

Validate local needs with one teacher partner, then co-design and safety-review one low-cost experiment before a small pilot.